ConflictCheck · conflict screening for United States law practices Support 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Central, Monday to Friday

Live in 1,180 US practices

Know whether you can take the matter before you hang up the phone.

ConflictCheck runs the client, the adverse parties, their affiliates and their counsel against every matter you have ever opened, while the caller is still talking. The search itself is saved as a dated record with the initials of whoever ran it.

In practice
1,180 solo and two attorney firms
Median search
41 seconds, name to result
On file
Seven years of dated records
Solo attorney at a wooden desk reviewing a client intake form beside a laptop, law books and a brass lamp behind her
Intake desk, 4:40 p.m. Screening no. 26,411

Article I: the exposure

A conflict you miss at intake is a conflict opposing counsel finds at deposition.

No solo practice loses a matter because the attorney was careless. It goes wrong because the client list lives in four places, the caller gives you a first name and a street, and the person on the other side of the file has been in your office once before, six years ago, under a different last name.

Exhibit A

The list nobody owns

Active clients are in the practice management system, closed files are in a 2014 spreadsheet, and the consults that never signed are on a legal pad in the drawer. Checking all three takes real time, so on a busy Thursday it does not happen.

About 2 hours rebuilt by hand, every time a familiar surname turns up
Exhibit B

The consult you never opened a file for

Under Rule 1.18 a prospective client who told you something significant can bar you from the other side years later. If that conversation never became a matter number, nothing in your system remembers it.

Nothing billed in 2019, and the disqualification risk still live in 2026
Exhibit C

The adverse party with four names

Northgate Builders is also Northgate Builders LLC, NGB Construction and a bonding company two entities up. You screen the name you were given, it comes back clean, and the affiliate is the one you sued in 2022.

60 to 90 billable hours written off when a motion to disqualify lands
Exhibit D

No proof that you checked at all

Your carrier asks for screening documentation at renewal. A grievance investigator asks what you did before you took the file. Saying you always check is not the same as producing a dated record with a name and a time on it.

Grievance defense starts near $7,500 without a written screening log

Article II: the procedure

Four minutes at intake, and the file opens clean.

The same seven questions on every call, the search running underneath them, and a signed record at the end. Nothing here asks you to change how you practice, only where the answers land.

Take the call on the structured intake form

Client name and any former names, the adverse parties, known related entities, the referral source, opposing counsel if the caller knows it, and the county. The form works on a phone, so it does not matter whether the call reaches you at the desk or in the parking lot at the courthouse.

Median completion: 3 minutes 40 seconds

The search runs while you are still typing

Every name is checked against your clients, your adverse parties, your prospective client ledger, your related entity records and your closed matters going back as far as you imported. Aliases, married names, trade names and common misspellings are matched, not just exact strings.

Median result: 41 seconds after the last name is entered

Read the hits with the file attached

A hit is never a red light with no explanation. You get the matter number, the date the file opened and closed, the role that person played, which attorney handled it and the note whoever ran the last screening left behind. That is what you need to decide under Rule 1.7 or Rule 1.9.

Every hit links straight to the underlying matter

Sign the record, then open or decline the file

Clear or not, the screening is saved with the date, the exact terms searched, the results returned and your initials. Decline the matter and the record shows why. Take it and the record travels with the file, ready for the carrier, the bar or the next attorney who touches it.

Export as PDF whenever a third party asks

Leather bound legal ledger, fountain pen and a stack of manila matter folders on a mahogany desk
The paper version of this took an afternoon a week. The record it produced was never this complete.

Article III: the mechanism

Six things the search does that a memory and a spreadsheet cannot.

Built with attorneys who screen their own intake, in practices where nobody has a conflicts clerk down the hall.

Alias, maiden name and DBA matching

Smith Bros. Excavating and Smith Brothers Excavating LLC land on the same record, and a married name entered in 2017 still surfaces when the caller gives you the one on her driver license today. Phonetic matching catches the spellings your intake sheet never agreed on.

Corporate affiliate trees

Record a parent, a subsidiary, a general partner or a surety once, and every future search walks that tree on its own. When you screen a franchisee you see the franchisor you already represent, with the matter number sitting next to it.

A ledger for prospective clients

Consultations that never became matters get their own dated entry, with the subject matter and whether confidential information was shared. Rule 1.18 stops depending on whether you happen to remember a phone call from four years ago.

Sync with the system you already pay for

Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther and Smokeball push new contacts and matters into the party index within minutes, so the search is never reading last quarter's list. Solo Practice covers the same ground with CSV import and export.

Waiver and consent letters ready to send

When a hit is waivable, the informed consent letter is drafted with the parties, the matter description and the nature of the conflict already filled out for you. You edit the language, send it, and the signed reply attaches to the same screening record.

A screening record that stands up later

Each search is written to a record carrying the date, the exact terms run, every hit returned, the decision taken and the initials of the person who took it. Records are immutable once signed, and a later amendment is appended rather than overwriting what was there.

Article IV: the return

What subscribing practices report after two quarters.

Figures below come from usage in the 1,180 practices running ConflictCheck as of February 2026, and from the intake time studies fourteen of them ran with us in 2025.

41 sec

From last name typed to result

The index is built for name matching rather than full text search, so a practice with 22,000 party records returns in the same time as one with 900. The caller hears a pause, not a hold.

6.5 hrs

Returned to billable work each month

Two attorney firms in the time study spent between eight and eleven hours a month reconstructing lists by hand. Structured intake plus automatic search cut that to roughly ninety minutes of review.

100%

Of opened matters carry a dated record

The file cannot be opened in ConflictCheck without a completed screening attached to it. That is the part carriers ask about, and it is the part that used to depend on the busiest week of the year going well.

7 yrs

Of history in a single export

Small Firm and Firm Plus keep seven years of screening records, matching the retention most state bars expect for client files. One button produces the whole bundle as dated PDFs with an index page.

Article V: the record of use

Attorneys who screen their own intake, in their own words.

Average rating 4.8 out of 5 across the three practices quoted here, all of whom have run ConflictCheck on every new matter for at least eleven months.

I had a consultation in 2019 that never became a matter. Two years later the husband called about the same divorce, from the other side. The only thing standing between me and that file used to be my memory of a phone call. Now the name comes up flagged before I have finished writing it down, with the consult date sitting right next to it.

Danielle Okafor Attorney and owner, Okafor Family Law, Dayton, Ohio

We take construction defect work, so the adverse party is never one company. It is a parent, two subsidiaries and whoever wrote the bond. ConflictCheck walks that tree instead of me drawing it on a legal pad. When my carrier asked for screening documentation at renewal I exported eleven months of records in about a minute and went back to work.

Grant Whitfield Managing attorney, Whitfield and Cruz PLLC, Tulsa, Oklahoma

My intake volume is high and most of it arrives by phone after six in the evening. The form makes me ask the same seven questions every single time, which by itself was worth the subscription. Then it found an employer I had represented in a wage case in 2022, on a call I would have taken without thinking twice. That one search paid for the year.

Priya Raghunathan Solo practitioner, Raghunathan Immigration Law, Sacramento, California
26,400 Matters screened through ConflictCheck during 2025
1,180 US practices running a screening on every new intake
93% Of screenings closed before the intake call ended

Article VI: terms of subscription

Three tiers, priced for practices without a conflicts department.

Unlimited screening on every tier. What changes is how many attorneys sign records, how deep the party index runs and how long the records are kept.

Solo Practice

One attorney, up to two staff seats

$49 per month

  • Unlimited conflict screenings
  • Structured intake form on desktop and phone
  • Party index up to 5,000 records
  • Alias, maiden name and DBA matching
  • Prospective client ledger under Rule 1.18
  • 18 months of dated screening records
  • CSV import and export
  • Email support, replies inside one business day
Request a demo
Recommended

Small Firm

Two attorneys, up to six staff seats

$119 per month

  • Everything in Solo Practice
  • Party index up to 25,000 records
  • Corporate affiliate trees and entity linking
  • Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther and Smokeball sync
  • Waiver and consent letter drafting
  • Shared intake links for referral partners
  • Seven years of screening record retention
  • Quarterly export bundle for your carrier
Request a demo

Firm Plus

Up to five attorneys, unlimited staff seats

$249 per month

  • Everything in Small Firm
  • Unlimited party index
  • Ethical wall tracking for lateral hires
  • Prior firm matter import with screening notes
  • Read and write API plus webhook events
  • Role based permissions and full audit trail
  • Scheduled phone support with a named contact
  • Annual review of your screening policy in writing
Request a quote

Every plan is billed monthly in US dollars and can be cancelled at any time from the billing screen, with no exit fee and no annual contract. Prices are per practice, not per matter, and a screening that comes back clean costs the same as one that does not: nothing extra. Sales tax is added where your state requires it.

Article VII: questions on the record

The six questions attorneys ask us before the demo.

If yours is not here, write to us and you will get an answer from someone who can open the product, not a form reply.

Appendix: the docket

The Conflicts Docket

The Conflicts Docket is where the reporting behind this product is published: how intake is actually run, what the conflicts rules require of a two lawyer office, how malpractice premiums are rated, and what a disqualification motion costs when it lands. Three recent articles are below.

An open cloth bound rulebook on a lectern in a law library aisle lit by high window light

Regulation and compliance

What Rule 1.18 Requires After a Prospective Client Calls

A caller who never hires you can still disqualify you. Model Rule 1.18 sets the confidentiality owed to prospective clients and the narrow path back to representing the other side.

Read all nine articles in The Conflicts Docket

Article VIII: request a demo

Bring us a call you took last week.

Tell us how intake runs in your office today. On a twenty minute screen share we will take that same call through ConflictCheck against a copy of your own matter list, and you will see the screening record it produces at the end.

What the record looks like when the call ends

Screening no.26,411
Run atFebruary 24, 2026, 4:41 p.m. CT
Prospective clientHarlan Voss
Adverse partyNorthgate Builders LLC
Affiliates searchedNGB Construction, Northgate Holdings
Records searched7,412 parties, 2,118 matters
Hits returned1, matter 2022-114, closed
DeterminationWaivable, consent letter sent
SignedD.M.O.

Filed and locked

An attorney on our side reads every request and answers within one business day. Prefer email? Write straight to jimenezjulien42@gmail.com.